Fri, 4 December 2009 Comments[0] |
Mon, 23 November 2009 Comments[0] |
Fri, 13 November 2009 Comments[0] |
Wed, 28 October 2009 Comments[0] |
Fri, 25 September 2009 Comments[0] |
Tue, 22 September 2009 Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This week, both John and I are out and about at conferences, necessitating the dreaded, lo-fi phone recording option. Enjoy!
Disclosure: Groundwork, Reductive Labs, Dell, and others are clients. Comments[0] |
Thu, 10 September 2009 Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This week, John and I catch up the virtualization and cloud news that's been floating around over the past week, of which there was much:
Disclosure: see the the RedMonk client list for clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Wed, 2 September 2009 Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: While at the RedHat Summit/JBoss World today, I sat down for a quick chat with GroundWork's David Dennis and Zenoss' Mark Hinkle. I ask them for their thoughts on the show, RedHat 5.4 and KVM, Mark's take on the recent Bossie awards, and how they're looking at VMWare/SpringSource/Hyperic now-a-days. Disclosure: GroundWork and Zenoss are clients, as is SpringSource. Comments[0] |
Fri, 28 August 2009 Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This week John and I discuss several things:
Disclosure: see RedMonk clients for clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Tue, 18 August 2009 In episode 50 (!), John and I discuss:
Better show notes soon... Disclosure: SpringSource is a client, as is Canonical. See the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Thu, 30 July 2009 Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This week, John and I meander around several topics:
Disclosure: many folks mentioned are clients, see the RedMonk clients list for which ones. Comments[0] |
Fri, 24 July 2009 Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: John and I review the week's IT management cloud news:
Disclosure: IBM is a client, see the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Tue, 14 July 2009 Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This week, John and I have a fun guest on, Rob England, aka, The IT Skeptic:
Comments[0] |
Thu, 2 July 2009 Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: John and I caught up earlier in the week. Despite it being a short time between this episode and the last, we found plenty to talk about:
Disclosure: Reductive Labs (Puppet), IBM, and Zenoss are client. Comments[0] |
Wed, 24 June 2009 Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: During the second night of Velocity, in the piano-filled sunken lounge of the Fairmont Hotel, John and I talk with Reductive Lab's Andrew Shafer, who walked up just in time to be the guest for this episode. We start out talking about Reductive Lab's big news of the day, getting $2,000,000 in funding. Andrew tells us what Reductive Labs plans are for the moment: working on some additional offerings on-top of Puppet that have been wanting for awhile and, as with all newly funded open source companies, focusing on the community. We then turn Velocity itself as I ask Andrew and John what they've seen and liked at the conference so far. This gets us into a conversation about what a "traditional" enterprise operations guy would think of this Velocity. As I put it, it'd be fun to do an "Alice in Wonderland" with one of these operations guys and see what they thought about the high-scale, web operations focus of the conference. Latching on another trend, we discuss how the web operations folks at Velocity seem to have less silos in their "IT departments" (groups of 3-10 folks, usually) and how "doing everything" effects the approach and tools vs. traditional enterprise organizations. We discuss some of the other tidbits from the conference sessions of the day: focusing on queueing more, the mythical flickr provisioning systems, etc. I then try to extract some other IT Management items from Andrew, but, having focused on Reductive Labs of late, he's got nothing. So I ask him how he keeps up with IT Management news now-a-days. In place of RSS feeds, he uses Twitter. This gets us into a discussion of the efficacy of RSS vs. Twitter vs. both and so on. Catching up on the news since Thursday, we mention the RightScale and Hyperic/SpringSource partnership. I then briefly go over the AccelOps launch from today. We wrap-up by talking about the rest of the week, where we think we'll be moving into "the dry-cleaning cloud" at Structure. Disclosure: Reductive Labs, SpringSource, and AccelOps are clients. As is IBM. Comments[0] |
Mon, 22 June 2009 Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This week, John and I are joined by Ethan Galstad, the "father of Nagios." Having caught up on the news in the previous episode, we spend the entire time talking about Nagios, Ethan's history with it, and Nagios Enterprise's present and future. First, Ethan gives us a quick overview of Nagios, the open source monitoring framework used by (Ethan & co. estimate) 250,000 users world-wide. Following this, we start out talking about different scenarios where Nagios is used. And then I get ask Ethan to give us a brief of architectural overview of Nagios. John asks about events vs. collecting all data and Nagio's take on that divide. In the context of enterprise installs, John asks Ethan if he see lots shelf-ware out there. That gets Ethan to talk about several sites he gone in that use Nagios along-side Big 4 offerings. Next, I ask Ethan about the commercial services around Nagios. They're building up several support deals, and have been doing some service engagements. John asks about Nagios scaling - the biggest installs, how many nodes typically get used. I also ask Ethan a question I get asked a fair amount myself: why hasn't Ethan started a company like others have done in the open source IT Management space? After discussing it, this gets Ethan into a discussion of how he's like to see Nagios commercialized, keeping closer to the open source way of thinking than doing things like, say node limits. John gets into forking open source projects which leads to the forking of Nagios a month ago. Ethan tells us what his reaction at the time and then the resulting community management Ethan and Nagios folks have been doing afterwards. We also talk about ICINGA, the recent fork of Nagios. Finally, him being up in the Twin Cities, I ask him what the tech scene in Minneapolis/St. Paul is like. Disclosure: IBM, Zenoss, GroundWork, and Hyperic/SpringSource are clients, as is HP. See the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Fri, 19 June 2009 Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This week, John and I catch up on several weeks worth of news, cramming a lot in:
Disclosure: IBM, Microsoft, GroundWork, Zenoss, Spiceworks, Intuit, and Cloudera are clients. See the RedMonk client list for other clients that might have been mentioned. Comments[0] |
Thu, 7 May 2009 Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This week, traditional IT Management seems to dominate our discussion, which is kind of refreshing for how much glad talk we've been doing of late. We discuss:
Disclosure: IBM, Microsoft, Spiceworks, Hyperic, SpringSource, and GroundWorks are clients. Comments[0] |
Mon, 4 May 2009
Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: John and I are back after a few weeks hiatus (I've been traveling too much, see above). There's tons of news to pick from, and most of what we go over is cloud related since that's been coming hot and heavy recently:
Also, we finally have John's new "IT Management Guys" hit theme-song. Comments[0] |
Thu, 2 April 2009
Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This week, John and I are back on Skype for That Fine Audio Quality. We spend most of our time talking about all the cloud news this week:
Disclosure: see the list of RedMonk clients for clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Mon, 30 March 2009
Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: Recorded last week, in this episode John and I catch up on the IT management and cloud related news, like:
Disclosure:IBM, Cloudera, Sun, Groundwork, and others are clients. Comments[0] |
Sat, 7 March 2009
Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: As ever, your co-hosts are John M. Willis and Coté. This week, we discuss:
Disclosure: IBM, Groundwork, Acquia, and Microsoft are clients. Comments[0] |
Thu, 26 February 2009
Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here:
Disclosure: IBM, AlterPoint, Microsoft, Appcelerator, and Sun are clients. Comments[0] |
Sat, 21 February 2009
Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This week, John and I hit up a lot of private cloud talk but go over some big "traditional" IT Management news as well. We discuss:
Disclosure: IBM is a client, as are RedHat, Microsoft, Comments[0] |
Fri, 13 February 2009
Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: Earlier this week, John and I were at IBM Tivoli Pulse 2009 for all of the exciting cloud announcements. We spend the bulk of the episode talking about those announcements, but get to other IT management news as well. The agenda ended up being:
Also, see the two IT Management video specials we recorded at Pulse: one with John and one with James. Disclosure: IBM is a client, as is GroundWork. See the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Fri, 6 February 2009
Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This week John and I cover much cloud talk and some general news items:
And don't forget to follow (and add to!) the Disclosure: many companies mentioned are RedMonk clients, see the RedMonk client list. Comments[0] |
Sat, 31 January 2009
Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This week, John and I discuss:
Disclosure: see the RedMonk client list for clients mentioned. My brother-in-law works at Idera, pictured above. Comments[0] |
Fri, 23 January 2009 ![]()
Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: In this episode, John and I discuss:
Disclosure: Splunk is a client, as are IBM, Microsoft, Hyperic, and Spiceworks. See the RedMonk client list for more clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Fri, 23 January 2009 ![]() Note: It seems I forgot to post last week's episode. Here it is, late. Apologies! Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: In this episode, John and I discuss:
Disclosure: IBM and Reductive Labs (Puppet) are clients. See the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Fri, 9 January 2009 Comments[0] |
Fri, 9 January 2009 Comments[0] |
Wed, 17 December 2008 (Warning: we manage to let slip 2 or 3 four letter words in this episode, so be warned if that offends.) Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This text will be replaced
For this special episode of the IT Management podcast, we go over our whacky predictions for 2009. John and I lucky to be joined by Dave Rosenberg (see also his Open Sources podcast with Matt Asay), self described "man about town," and IT Management Podcast regular Matt Ray, community manager at Zenoss. Very quickly, we first review the 2008 whacky predictions (from our first show, how cute!), all of which were, indeed, whacky save one, which was a sort of timid prediction. And then it gets into the whack-job free-for-all with all four of throwing out our tech world predictions and discussing each. Sprinkled throughout the truly whacky predictions (Apple buys Sun), we have some pretty rational ones (Eucalyptus and Cloudera becoming big deals). Here's an incomplete preview, whacky and sane:
Disclosure: IBM, Microsoft, Cloudera, and Zenoss are clients, as was Dave's former employer, MuleSource. See the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Fri, 12 December 2008
Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This text will be replaced
We join Amazon EU, launching AWS in Europe. This gets us into a discussion about the geographic importance of cloud computing when it comes to performance and regulation. This gets us into a recent conversation I had where a vendor had been trying to convince a customer to get into way over-priced cloud computing. Sometimes, on-premise will be just fine, not to mention cheaper. I bring up a recent write-up by Dave Rosenberg about using cloud and SaaS at one of his past companies, and then John tells us about listening in to the recent Oracle on AWS call. We re-cap the Zoho CloudSQL news as well. As I was at Cisco C-Scape this week, I go over the cloud and IT related content and impressions I gathered over in San Jose. Mixed in somewhere here we talk about counter-intutive interview tips like: something they want you tell them the question is confusing because that's what your job is going to be like. Disclosure: see the RedMonk client list for clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Mon, 1 December 2008
John and I get together at the beginning of this week to make up for last week's holiday skipage. While there's not a lot of news items & announcements, we manage to pull out a nice 90 minutes of several topics (out of order):
Also, check out the sweet potato casserole recipe John mentioned, and, as I mentioned, Royer's out in Round Top, Texas - damn good food and pies. Disclosure: see the RedMonk client list for clients mentioned above and in the podcast. Comments[0] |
Fri, 21 November 2008
Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This text will be replaced
Late on a Friday after a week of somewhat thin IT Management news, John and I still manage to pull out some interesting topics:
Also, I forgot to mention an endorsement for John's Cloud Droplets podcast be sure to check those out. I've been behind on my Debriefing podcast, and it looks like John has picked up the slack in a fantastic way. Disclosure: IBM, Microsoft, Hyperic, and Zenoss are clients. See the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Sat, 15 November 2008
Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This text will be replaced
Not having recorded for a couple of weeks, we had a huge crop of IT related news to go over:
And, there's more of course - like why companies might actually benefit from being in stealth mode rather than "flailing" about in public. We also spend time talking about pulling in Web 2.0 IT management innovations (and IT in general) into the enterprise. Disclosure: IBM, Hyperic, Zenoss, GroundWork, Spiceworks, Cloudera, and Microsoft are clients. See the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Tue, 21 October 2008
Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This text will be replaced
Being in Brussels for Tivoli training (see waffles above), I ask John to give us his usual take on the character of the IT Management people he's encountering on the road. We both agree that the European IT Management folks he tends to deal with tend to be extremely straight-forward, at least compared to the sugar-coating goodie nice-guys we're both used to in America. While there isn't a lot of news to cover for this episode, I ask John to walk us through troubled economic times he's been through in the past. More so than just targeting the effect on IT - and how IT can survive bad money times - I ask him how it effect IT Management. After discussing that topic for the bulk of the episode, John gives us his take on the Novell plans to acquire Managed Objects and I reprise my analysis of as well. We also talk about the virtualization numbers out on Microsoft's market share in that space, and John tells us about the uptick in PowerShell he's seen, at least in one study. Somewhere along the way we end up talking about BMC's IT Masters acquisition of a few years ago as well. Disclosure: IBM is a client, as are Microsoft, ManagedObjects and BMC. Comments[0] |
Fri, 17 October 2008 ![]() Download the episode directly right here, subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically, or just click play below to listen to it right here: This text will be replaced
John was occupied for this podcast, so I rounded up two stand-ins: Tarus Balog and Brandon Whichard, both returning guests. Among other topics, we discuss the recent finding in the wild of OpenNMS, maps and dashboards in IT Management platforms, Novell putting in plans to buy Managed Objects, CMDBf being demo'ed, and we get general updates on OpenNMS and Zenoss from Tarus and Brandon. Disclosure: Zenoss is a client, as are Managed Objects and IBM. See the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Thu, 9 October 2008
Download the episode directly right here, or subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically. This week, John and I manage to balance out time between traditional IT Management and cloud talk. While we discuss IBM's cloud announcements of earlier this week, we also talk about the idea of predictive analytics (from Tivoli, BMC, and others). Also, we talk about "virtual reality" (Second Life and friends) and how that might not be such a crock of...crock. For the fun-bunch out there, we give a short take on the IT Skeptic's book, Real ITSM, which is well worth checking out. Disclosure: IBM and BMC are clients, as is Sun. See the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Wed, 1 October 2008
Download the episode directly right here, or subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically. This week, John "The Cloud to Everyone's Silver-lining" Willis and I start out talking about the recent spate of cloud-bashing, from Messieurs Larry and Stallman. Partly in response, I point out a nice piece from Savio Rodrigues in reply to all this trough of disillusionment talk. Bouncing off some Gnip gnews, I ask John about the revenue for things like Amazon EC2: can you really survive off $0.40/month/customer? We also discuss the implications of Windows running in the cloud, on Amazon EC2. Mid-way through, we're joined by Zenoss's Brandon Whichard. We start out discussing the idea of "market-places" that I've been seeing getting attention of late (see yesterday's debriefing that mentioned Zoho marketplace). Brandon points out the common theme here: the return of making money off software. Having worked with Brandon over the years, I ask him for his take on IT Management (he having departed into Identity Management for 4 years and recently come back). After John asks about the next part of the enterprise stack to be commoditized, we get into a lengthy discussion of reporting in IT Management: it never seems to do perfectly what users want, why is it that? Disclosure: Zenoss is a client, as are Microsoft and IBM. See the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Thu, 25 September 2008
Download the episode directly right here, or subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically. This week John and I return to our laxidasical agenda, covering a disparate range of topics:
And, there's of course more, including an opening discussion of U.B. Funkeys and kidrobot figurines at the Austin branch of the hipster bookstore Domy. And, check out the sponsor for this episode: At ITKnowledgeExchange.com, engage in a community of IT peers like yourself, asking and answering their toughest IT questions. Visit ITKnowledgeExchange.com today. Disclosure: Managed Objects, BMC, and IBM are clients. See the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Fri, 19 September 2008
Download the episode directly right here, or subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically. As promised last week, we get back to topical news and commentary this week. John starts out talking about super computers briefly, then we discuss super computers. We then discuss Citrix (whose Santa Clara building is pictured above), 3Tera, and VMWare's recent cloud talk. I ask John how 3rd party cloud suppliers are tackling licensing for elastic deployments, we bump up against cloud standards, and we close out with me mentioning VDI stuff and asking how it "feels" to folks, like you, dear listeners. We also squeek in talk of multi-core coding (see the Grady Booch video I mention) and how identity and IT management will, no doubt, find a lot of work all the buying up going on in the financial sector at the moment. Identity management gold fields in financial world M&AComments[0] |
Fri, 12 September 2008
Download the episode directly right here, or subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically. In this fantastically rich episode, we talk with Jane Curry, of Skills 1st, about her recent evaluation of Nagios, OpenNMS, and Zenoss. This evaluation resulted in a 148 page draft paper, "Open Source Management Options," which we glide through in this episode, hitting on the pluses and minuses of each platform from the stand-point of looking for a network management platform. Book-ending the discussion of Jane's paper, we first discuss some early history of Tivoli and network management in general. On the other end, we briefly talk about the recent spate of virtualization news (which we'll get to next week) and talk about my recent trip to Finland, pictured above. Also, as you'll hear at the start, this episode is sponsored by ITKnowledgeExchange.com, so go check them out for getting answers to your toughest IT questions. Disclosure: Zenoss is a client, as is IBM. Comments[0] |
Thu, 7 August 2008
Download the episode directly right here, or subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically. John Willis and I kick off another episode talking about the Tivoli Agent Builder training he's currently doing. This scoots me down memory lane to where I once worked on a similar hunk of software for BMC. We then talk about the telneting and other remote command-shell applications available for the iPhone - seemingly no SSH, though. Tracking back into IBM land John asks briefly about the iLog acquisition, and we talk about a new open source event management startup in the works. Finally, we wrap-up with me amazed at the explosion in cloud-hype chatter out there and we spend a pretty large chunk of time talking about thin desktops right before I wrap up by plugging my recent piece on collaborative IT management. Disclosure: IBM is a client, as is Adobe. Check out the RedMonk client list for more RedMonk clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Fri, 1 August 2008 Craig tells us about his research on telcos using open source IT management software, like OpenNMS. Check out his site for more. My voice gets crackly towards the end, sorry about that.Comments[0] |
Fri, 1 August 2008 As Matt works on the architecture of OpenNMS, I drill him about OpenNMS's, you know, architecture: the different components, how they talk with each other, and more. If you're someone who makes IT management software, you might like this one.Comments[0] |
Fri, 1 August 2008 Wherein we discuss how Bill's employer came to use OpenNMS.Comments[0] |
Fri, 1 August 2008 Tarus gives an overview of what's been happening at DevJam and OpenNMS in general. Before wrapping up, I ask him how OpenNMS does product management, that is, determining what features get in.Comments[0] |
Fri, 1 August 2008 After discussing what Ben does with OpenNMS, we pick up the conversation about project management in OpenNMS. And we also talk of dice-nerdery.Comments[0] |
Thu, 17 July 2008 ![]() Download the episode directly right here, or subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically. In this episode, we're joined by Tarus Balog of OpenNMS and also Matt Ray of Zenoss. John Willis gets on half-way though after a Skype-blow-out. We start out talking about OpenNMS, of course, and then get into some other topics:
Them's the highlights I jotted down while we talked. There's more locked up in there, like Tarus' take on cloud computing. Disclaimer: Zenoss is a client, as is AlterPoint and IBM. See the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Thu, 10 July 2008 Download the episode directly right here, or subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically. In this episode, John and I start out talking about training for IT departments. We then get into a discussion of Managed Objects' myCMDB for which James Governor and I had a briefing earlier this week. The first question people have been asking me - John included - is "was the IT Skeptic right?" Also, see this guest post over in McClure-land. After this, we pull up our favorite topic clouds, briefily mentioning the "WHAO, COWBOY! SECURITY FREAK-OUT! CODE-BROWN! CODE-BROWN!" piece on the need for more security think in cloud land. Finally, we wrap up with the idea of "Grounded Clouds," or making sure to connect up your cloud stuff with all the on-premise software that exists out there. We get into commenting that most cloud providers probably have little idea about what "enterprise workloads" are (listener challenge: how many can you name?) and thus would be hard-pressed to figure out what to even migrate to the cloud. Less cynically, we talk about the interesting write-up of Cybernet moving its payroll system to EC2. This is the kind of think we need to see more of. Disclaimer: IBM is a client, as is BMC. For other RedMonk clients mentioned, see the RedMonk client list. Comments[0] |
Sat, 28 June 2008
Download the episode directly right here, or subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to have episodes downloaded automatically. In this episode, John and I use my past week of cloud conferences to - largely - explore more of the question of what monitoring and managing cloud computing would look like. We start with a brief mention of Microsoft's Hyper-V being released (congrats to them!), then get into a discussion of Hyperic's CloudStatus. Lacing into the tail-end of that, we move to a sort of spastic run-thru of the Force.com, Velocity, CloudCamp, and Structure conference I attended this week. Finally, John starts walking through some of the monitoring metrics he's been thinking about for cloud computing. As ever, our recording was cursed, so pardon the technical scattle towards the end. Disclaimer: Microsoft is a client, as is Hyperic. See the RedMonk client list for more clients mentioned. Comments[1] |
Sun, 22 June 2008
Download the episode directly here, or subscribe to the feed to have episodes downloaded automatically. After a long abcense, John "johnmwillis.com" Willis and I return for this episodes. We do some "admin" house cleaning at first, for example, figuring out what happened to the Zenoss jacket in the No Country for Old IT Guys series. The answer is pretty simple, turns out. Next, I mention the iTricity/Blue Cloud announcement iTricity of this week, which gets John on a commentary about trying to figure out what the Blue Cloud stuff actually is and what it's made up of, comparing to other cloud management systems out there like RightScale, Elastra, 3Tera, the use of Puppet and others. After getting cursed by the echo effect, I pull in Matt Ray, Community Manager for Zenoss, to join us. He gives us an update on the recently released Zenoss 2.2 Enterprise. John and I then of course ask Matt Ray a bunch of Zenoss related questions, esp. around ways people are using Zenoss and developments in the Zenoss community. We also decide to life the ban on cloud talk after a multi-episode hiatus, so we get in all sorts of discussion around that. I note that the conversations I get into now-a-days around "The Cloud" are largely definitional ones: that is, "what exactly is this cloud stuff?" We get into what we think that answer is, but more importantly we discuss what's left untouched in IT management by all the current cloud talk. I also ask the question, are enterprise applications ready to run on these clouds? I close out by briefly covering the recent Spiceworks 3.0 release and their new number of users: 350,000. Thanks to Matt Ray for being Johnny on the spot and jumping in ;> Disclaimer: Zenoss is a client, as are Spiceworks, IBM, and Reductive Labs. See the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Sun, 18 May 2008 ![]() Comments[0] |
Thu, 17 April 2008 ![]() Comments[0] |
Sun, 9 March 2008
Download the episode directly, or subscribe to the podcast feed. While at BarCampAustin3, John Willis and I talk with Mark Hinkle, of Zenoss. Mark being the guest, we spend most of the time talking about Zenoss and the roll of open source in IT Management. We also discuss the marketing benefits of Zenoss had at barcampESM. We then touch briefing on the OpenNMS/Cittio hoopla. Disclaimer: Zenoss is a client. See the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Mon, 3 March 2008 ![]() Download the episode directly here, or subscribe to the feed for auto-magic downloads in iTunes or other podcatcher. As ever, I plan on getting around to a more detailed description soon. This week, we had to do a quick recording while I was leaving the Austin airport. Getting a little out of the realm of IT Management, but still touching base as needed, John tells us about a visit to the Technology of Georgia Tech Summit, namely, about wikinomics. In doing so, we get to an interesting discusion of how lowering barriers to entry helps all sorts of fun things out. We then discuss a recent teaser post of John's, Seven Core Competencies for Enterprise Innovation. Disclaimer: see the RedMonk client list for clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Fri, 22 February 2008 ![]() Download the episode directly, or subscribe to the feed in iTunes or other podcatcher. As with last week's episode, I'l write a very brief summary for now and insert in a longer write-up later. This week John and I start by talking about having the flu - I know, exciting. We very quickly move onto this episodes John's Tales from IT Management Past with an overview of the Tivoli Framework. I start by asking John what the deal is with people having that "ask me to tell you why it sucks" twinkle in their eye when they bring the topic up. The story is much more complex than just that, as always. We then get into an extended, vendor name-check laden, discusion of John's recent Level 2 Cloud Provider Matrix, focusing on Mosso, Amazon, and RightScale. I ask him about people like Bungee Labs who are working at the top, application layer of cloud computing. Finally, we wrap up with a discussion about enterprise IT folks' perceptions that Amazon, Google, and others are running on the Post-it Note IT Process. As always, check out the ITManagementGuys tag in del.icio.us for additional IT Management things we noticed this week but may have missed talking about. Disclaimer: IBM is a client. Check the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Fri, 15 February 2008 ![]() Download the episode directly here, or subscribe to the feed for auto-magic downloads in iTunes or other podcatcher. In this episode, we have special guest William Vambenepe, IT Management blogger and "architect in the application and middleware management part of Oracle’s Enterprise Manager division" as he puts it. I'm going to try a new tact here for timelessness and write-up the lengthy description later in favor of posting the actual audio quickly. I figure this will be fine as the lengthy text is mostly for archival purposes and those subscribed to the feed will get their episode sooner rather than later without blocking on text they may or may not read. With that said, here is a brief summary: We talk with William about what Oracle is up to in IT Management, and then, launching off a recent post of his on Microsoft and SML, get off into the tasty weeds of SML, CML, and friends. As it turns out, William was on the spec for SML, so he's a great source of info. We then get into our usual cloud discussion, going over some companies John and I talked with this week, the need for SLAs for things like S3 going down, and other cloud management topics. William introduces the fun topic of "the Hollywood model," except applies to IT Management rather just software development in general. I note that this seems like an interesting way to theorize about what the cloud work-culture would look like. Thanks again to William for guesting, he was great fun and hopefully we can get him back again ;> Disclaimer: see the RedMonk client list for any RedMonk clients mentioned. Comments[0] |
Mon, 11 February 2008
Hosted by John Willis and myself, as always. Download the episode directly, or subscribe the podcast feed in iTunes or other podcatcher to auto-magically get each episode. The itmanagementguys TagFirst, we throw out a little pro-top for you: if you want to see a good idea of what we'll talk about each week, check out the del.icio.us tag "itmanagementguys". Also, if you want to stick something on our radar, feel free to tag it with itmanagementguys yourself and we'll consider it. Acquia, Drupal, and CMSJohn then jumps into a post from Acquia's Jeff Whatcott on the continuing quest of Acquia to shake off the category of CMS from Drupal. On the topic of open source, I mention this year's funny statement from Gartner on open source: by 2012, 80% of software will use open source. As I summarize, if you're not using open source by now, make sure your boss doesn't know 'cause you should be fired. We get back to the topic of Drupal being a CMS or not. In summary, there is some truth to the idea that platforms like Drupal, django, and Apache Cocoon aren't "CMS" systems in the classic sense, but are used for largely the same goals: making public web sites, if not with richer "write" abilities. What up with VCs Hating Services?And then we launch into an extended discussion of the VC/Open Source services paradox/lie. As I note, I've discussed this idea with several people. What is it? In summary, the train of thought is that telling a VC that you're going to base your business on providing services and support is VC poison. If you're an open source company, VCs don't want your money-pipe to be based on humans doing things. And yet! It seems that most cash-outs of VC funded open source companies are based primarily on the acquiring company wanting to provide services around the open source project. For example, Sun buying MySQL for $1 billion dollars. Not to mention the billions of dollars of revenue that companies like IBM, Sun, Accenture, and others make from services. More pertinent to the topic at hand, a huge amount of IT Management sales are around services: getting a legal copy of the software is a tiny part of the monetized elements up getting an IT Management suite up and running. In short: it doesn't seem to make sense that services, which can generate billions in revenue, are VC poison. The paradox/lie here, though, is that most open source companies base their business models on services and support. What exactly do VCs think is going on otherwise? But what do we know? Applications in the CloudNext, we jump into the "what and how are applications going to be run in the cloud" bucket on the topic of Google Team Edition. Team Edition allows people to create Google Apps installs around email addresses instead of domains, like how you identify your company and school affiliations in Facebook. I get all excited about this being a way to subvert IT, but John reminds me that he who controls the network controls the cloud: the IT department can just block access to google.com or whatever. Darn! John's Cloud LayersWith our foots in the door of our cloud-crazy talk, we jump into the cloud portion of our show. John mentions and we discuss his 0-3 level analysis of what cloud computing is. Without summarize the entire post here (just go read it!) the point is that there's virtualization at the bottom, some smattering of "grid" through-out, then a total un-caring of your IT's physical layout - topology even! - towards the top, with a very service oriented (vs. systems/software) perspective on things at the top. Or "SaaS" as we used to call it a scant 60-90 days ago. At the high level of cloud computing - a new way of running IT - I add more color to the tragic tale of the "Little 4" phrase, namely why I put openQRM/Qlusters in there originally. Part of my thinking was that the openQRM method of managing IT seemed new at the time and thus, while not a platform for IT Management as we know it, it was something new and different at a platform layer. But, as I admit, I was probably also just charmed by whurley. We then get into a discussion of how provisioning plays into managing a cloud/grid. John recalls promises of cloud-by-provisioning from Tivoli years ago. Then I launch into a painful metaphor of pass-by-value and pass-by-reference for two different ways of managing clouds: sort of provisioning vs. federation. Even I have no idea what I was talking about. John then tells us about checking out Cassett in reference to his cloud-craziness. Both them and 3Tera, he says, promise a way to deliver "utility computing." They both seem to be promising the same results. While John doesn't quite know which one is better, or whatever, his guy tells him that more closed systems - perhaps the pass-by-reference metaphor - would work better as there's less moving parts. SupercomputersAt this point, I segway into "the Parade section of the newspaper" and bring up some Cray talk I had recently. First, I was astonished that there were still Crays around - who uses the term "super-computer" anymore, right? Second, I learned that Crays being built today are massive: several sizes bigger than my house. Just one computer, bigger than my house! And, there is no more sexy phrase in systems than "vector processing." John then tells us about his time at Exxon where they purchased the first Cray for commercial use. Apparently, there was no I/O system on the Cray, so Exxon couldn't load up all of their seismic data from tape. He recalls a call with Cray, including Seymour Cray, where the Cray folks were confused as to why they wanted to load data from tapes. Hadoop, MapReduce, and IT/Business AlignmentWhat with super-computers out of the way, I admit to John that I have no idea why he cares about all this Hadoop stuff. How does this apply to IT Management? The summary is that all the fancy greek talk of Hadoop reduces - HELLO! - down to being able to quickly search over massive data sets. What's important here is that previously un-usuable information streams are (potentially) usable if you "index" them with Hadoop. The point here is that IT can provide the business side of the house with new sources of information to make decisions: "how are our sales doing for widget X world-wide, right now?" and so on. John tells us about how Rackspace is using Hadoop to look over mega-sized mail-logs. The connection here is to start thinking about how this stuff gets you new ways of doing IT Management, if not the holy grail of "IT/Business Alignment" - never mind the blinky lights, give me the data! As early examples, you can look towards Splunk, Paglo, LogLogic, Prism Microsystems, and others. See James Governor's coverage of Log Management as a category for more thinking. When it comes to being able to do something with stupid amounts of data, more high-powered, direct advertising comes to mind. For example, as I say, most of the reason money-hogs are interested in Facebook is the huge amount of data about people available. People are expressing interests and passions, group affiliations and friendships. For a money-hog, this means an easier way to find reasons to get cash from these people. Do you like summer sausage? Does your boyfriend like summer sausage? Why not buy some! All that Gillmorian Attention/Gesture stuff just might be onto something, if, you know, spam-y. Sun openxVMGetting towards the end of the show, I give a review of Sun's openxVM platform and strategy. I was most recently PowerPoint-stuffed at the Sun Analyst Event last week, so I brain-dump on the Sun IT Management plans. Whatever Happened to Chargebacks?We round out the show with another arcane topic from the past: chargebacks. Chargebacks are essentially internal billing between the IT department and "the business." As I note, it seems like charge-backs aren't as precise as they used to be probably, as John points out, because we no longer have the accounting ease that centralized mainframes bring. Disclaimer: Sun is a client, as are LogLogic and Prism. See the RedMonk client list for other clients mentioned above and in the podcast. Comments[0] |
Sat, 2 February 2008 ![]() This week we starts out with a review of John's monitoring panel at barcampESM. As he's said in other forums, he was pleased with the result. I then mention announcements and whitepapers around the Common Model Library (CML), which is a further evolution of the SML family of IT Management data models. There's a large cross-vendor effort, similar to the CMDBf, but there doesn't seem to be any open source folks - who knows if they weren't invited, or weren't interested. We move into out cloud talk episode of the episode, with me mentioning that I'm seeing the emergence of a bunch of "EC2 Juniors" sprouting up, like Rackspace's recent virtualization announcement. John tells us he's been digging into cloud talk quite a lot - into Mosso, Rackspce, and 3Tera. We touch on 3Tera briefly, who John talked with recently. Recalling a past briefing with them, I explain that they're basically cloud-in-a-box software that allows you to build your own grid, or build it out somewhere else. John then clarified that Rackspace's offering is just to run your VMWare server, not quite the same as running a cloud for you. Mosso, on the other hand, has a more virtualized, grid-driven setup. I ask John what he seems people running in the cloud - what type of applications. So far it seems like public web site applications like WordPress, drupal, and web servers. Before digging too much more into that discussion - which we pick up later - we dig into 3Tera more. 3Tera creates and sells the software to run a grid along with the management console for setting up and tying together components in the grid. You buy the software, and either install it in your own data center, or one of the data center providers that 3Tera works with. There's lots of drag-n-dropping to combine together load-balancers, databases, and web services. After John's detailed discussion of what 3Tera does, I jump back to the discussion of what people will run on these grids - what "work-loads" people can move to it. I re-cap the briefing Stephen O'Grady and I had a while ago with 3Tera and the frustrating we had around this question. We were thinking, sure, this grid stuff sounds great, fantastic. But, let's say we run an SAP install on-top of it, something goes wrong, we call up SAP support, and the first thing they ask us is "what operating system are you running it on?" If we tell them it's some grid technology they've never heard of, we'll probably get the support boot. The point is, when it comes to enterprise, business software, there's a lot of work to be done now to get existing business software to run, supported on all this new cloud stuff. Currently it seems to me we've got great technologies for running web site stacks and infrastructure for ISVs building out their own software. But for business users, for "enterprises" running other people's software, there's a huge gap in the glue-tooling between existing business software and being able to run it "in the cloud." We don't have any idea what this would look like, whether it's one of "the children of the VNC" type applications of what, but there doesn't seem to be anyone working on the problem. My suggestion, of course, is that this is a chance for a business or two: a framework that retrofits existing software to run in the cloud. Sure, the "real" solution is for software companies to write their new software "grid native," but that'll take a long time. Check out EnterpriseDB's cloud edition as well. John points out that this retooling could accelerate if Wall Street finally gets wise to the cost savings available by running stuff in the cloud. His premise is that there's a waste in the duplication of running data-centers, on-premise things. But, if investors got wind of how much savings were available - if Mad Money Jim Cramer were yelling about it and pressing red bonkers-sound buttons - the IT world would figure it out right quick. We joke that this would be "the ultimate business/IT alignment." The reward, as we get into, is the promise of cheaper and easier to run IT. On the face of it, this means less people. While good for "business," bad for those people who get laid of. I ask John, "what about the IT guys out of jobs?" and as he points out, technology has always seemingly reduced jobs and at the same time required lots of people to run. That is, it'll probably be all right. More specifically, by way of anecdote, John says there's so much "busy work" in IT now-a-days, that sopping up that busy work - like getting a developer Oracle instance spun up - is the real goal, which would free up people to do more important work, which there's no lack of. I then ask John what he meant by an earlier comment along he lines of ESM not going anywhere. He clarifies that he means nothing much is going to change in ESM, and then tells us about Doug McClure's idea for a Systems Management Database. Essentially, a unified console and central "brain" that sucks in monitoring data from all sorts of different agents, devices, and everything else - a layer above everything else that creates on place to look. While this sounds like what ESM is supposed to do in the first place, the slight difference that I glen is that the SMDB is supposed to unify the fragmented groups and tools that exist in IT shops. Rather than assume one tool will do away with those different silos, it instead accepts them and provides a new view of them. Out of the cloud and friends, John asks me about the possibility of Microsoft/Yahoo! now that Microsoft has an extended an offer to buy. I tell him the results of my Twitter poll, asking if people thought Microsoft would do right by flickr and del.icio.us. Pretty much everyone replied that they were worried that Microsoft would mess it up. I point out that it'd introduce a whole lot of new technology and cultures to Microsoft that Redmond wouldn't have brought on itself otherwise: OpenID, LAMP-like stacks for hardware, and general non-Microsoft IT. (Also, see another RedMonk take from James Governor.)We round up the the episode by talking about the recent Hyperic release, touching on performance fixes and Nagios importing. I note that it seems like all of the open source IT management platform folks are gearing up their performance chops to go for the enterprise management space rather than just the mid-market they're ostensibly known for. On Nagios, I paint out that the Nagios importing could enable either replacing or working with Nagios instals. Finally, John asks about the RedMonk 5th Birthday party next week in SF - come on by for a drink if you like! And then he points out RedMonk's recent award as part of LinuxWorld's 2008 Open Source Business Leaders series. Disclaimer: see the RedMonk clients list for a RedMonk clients mentioned in the podcast. Comments[0] |
Sat, 26 January 2008 ![]() John Willis moderates this panel from barcampESM '08 in Austin Texas on the topic of monitoring, if it matters, how it connects to "higher level" IT management ideas, and overall discusses the current state of monitoring in the IT management world. The panelist are a nicely diverse set from Zenoss (Erik Dahl), OpenNMS (Tarus Balog), IBM Tivoli (Heath Newburn), and BMC (Chip Holden). Disclaimer: IBM, Zenoss, and BMC are clients. Comments[0] |
Fri, 18 January 2008
This week, we're lucky enough to bring an episode recorded face-to-face. John came to Austin for barcampESM, so we recorded this up in his hotel room with a mute Doug McClure thumbing through trade-rags in the background and watching the "priceless" moments. As I was leaving the "studio," oddly enough, a hotel dude came by to drop off some cookies. What up with that? You can download the episode directly or get it by subscribing to the podcast feed. As an admin note, for those who'd like to just subscribe to the IT Management podcast, I've created a new feed that will download only those episodes. Show NotesMy notes this week will be much more clipped than last week - hopefully I'll be responsible enough to fill them out later. First, we talk about some DevCampTivoli news. Namely, John explains why he thinks they'll be successful in getting the "closed source" people to contribute. More importantly, he points out, they're going to skip all the time to install and setup the software in question by using virtual images. We then get to a conversation about CIM and other DMTF standards. John says he found a nice looking application modeling standard that appears to have disappeared. I ask John what the deal has been with the industry not widely using DMTF standards, and this launches into a nice tale of old, starting with Tivoli, going through Microsoft, and ending with Dell. As I mention to John, it looks like the DMTF's Winston Bumpus will be at barcampESM, so perhaps we can get some DMTF talk going on. Also, see the interview I did with Winston a little while ago. We also continue our discussion of cloud computing, talking about 3Tera briefly and then discussing John's use of EC2 in training and for running his website. Finally, we end up by talking about the biggest open source news of the week, Sun's $1B buy of MySQL. Being the IT Management podcast, we dig around for how this could effect the open source companies in IT Management. In summary: if there's an open source buying frenzy, it'll be good for some of those guys. More importantly, we reach back to a conversation we had at lunch about how open source IT Management folks respond to the question: "what do you do for BSM?" Most of them, John says, seem to be at the dashboard level of BSM tooling. We then talk about what the open source and closed source folks in IT Management have to offer each other. The open source folks, as they've shown, can move incredibly fast and innovate both when it comes to technology and business. The closed source folks have maturity and stronger BSM folks. Back to the "2008 will be big for open source," both of us say how we hope at least one of The Little 4 and Big 4 get together and see what benefits can be had by combining the best of both worlds. As we mention in the podcast, we're going to try to do some recordings at barcampESM - hopefully John's panel at least. The name of the virtualization company in Austin who's name I forgot is Surgient. Also, in the area of names we forgot, thanks to Damon Edwards for the kind words on episode 001. Disclaimer: Sun and MySQL are clients, as it IBM. Check RedMonk's client list for other clients mentioned in the podcast and above. Comments[0] |
Fri, 11 January 2008 ![]() In this first episode of what I'm planning on being a weekly or semi-weekly podcast, John Willis and I launch the IT Management Podcast. As you know, dear readers, I have an unshakable interest in IT Management. It's always been a pleasure talking with John in the past (RedMonk Radio #42, #44, video 1, and video 2), so I thought we'd cook up a sort of commentary/news round-up show as Ryan and I have done with RIA Weekly. If you've got things to contribute, topic or guest suggestions, or would like to be on yourself, feel free to drop me a line. So, enjoy the show. Here are some detailed notes if you'd rather skim: barcampESMWe open up by taking about barcampESM, an even John has been working on with whurley and Mark Hinkle for sometime. The final dates are the night of Jan 18th and then the day of 19th at J Black's in Austin, on 6th Street. John tells us about a panel discussion he's planning on monitoring; it looks like we got Chip Holden to be the BMC panelist. MonitoringSpeaking of monitoring, I ask John where he sees monitoring's value in the IT management landscape. As both of us relate, it seems like most people de-value the place of monitoring in favor of the higher level IT management tasks. By "de-value" we mean, of course, spend less time and money. The perception is that monitoring is "done" and that it's largely a commodity. While this may be true, it could also be the case folks have cut too close to the bone. John points out, of course, that now that we have plenty of higher level IT management functionality, the underlying data becomes even more important. As the old saying goes, "garbage in, garbage out." "The Cloud"With the renewed interest in The Cloud from all the discussion of The Big Switch (no little amount from here, dear readers), we spend quite a bit of time talking about what Cloud Computing means for IT Management. As John says, "Cloud computing...what are we supposed to do? You know, what is ESM supposed to do?" John talks about his attempts to get Google to tell him about their IT Management technology and practices are as sort of an answer to his question of the role of the IT department when everything's behind a URL. We don't have any definitive answers, but we have plenty of speculation and possibilities to throw out. While it'd be great to see people like Google and Amazon tell the world more of how they do Cloud IT Management, we both agree that, really, that knowledge is a large part of Cloud Provider's trade-secrets: the "closed" part of their otherwise "open" systems. Drupal & AcquiaSince I know that John is a nut for Drupal, I lurch out a bit from talking about IT Management o discuss Drupal and the new open source startup, Acquia with him, written up earlier this week. While Drupal is a bit difficult to get up and running compared to things like WordPress, John says that it's proven incredibly powerful for him. Indeed, he's been looking towards using Drupal as an IT Management knowledge base. I ask John if there's a good chance for doing Drupal management, and he points out that like FiveRuns, if there's a community of users putting stuff into production, then, sure, there's room - maybe even a good market - in tooling the management for Drupal. FiveRunsRelated to FiveRuns, I point out a recent announcement from FiveRuns partnering with Atlantic Dominion Solutions (not a UK hosting company, that was another announcement) to help manage rails installs in Amazon EC2. That's the first time I've heard of someone doing management of EC2 instances - though, I'd assume there's others. Nagios CheckinI ask John if he's heard anything about how going commercial has gone for Ethan Galstad of Nagios. John just points out the partnership with GroundWork, but says he hasn't heard anything else. A New Website for the Open Management ConsortiumNext we discuss the happenings over at the OMC website, namely a new site with forums and blogs. As I note later in the episode, things seemed to have died down a bit on the OMC mailing list, but there's been a noticeable spike in activity with the new site launch. Does ITIL Mater?Spring-boarding off some recent activity in the new OMC around the topic, I ask John to tell us about the continued discussion around his does ITIL matter? discussion in the Tivoli mailing list and elsewhere. As with most "schools of thought" that include certifications, John says he's found that people who are certified tend to be ITIL supporters, where-as newly exposed people tend to be skeptical of it. Trying to figure out how much ITIL is actually out there, I ask John if he's ever walked into a client's shop and thought, "ahhh, ITIL!" finding a place that's gotten themselves all ITIL'ed up. Very quickly he says, "no." But, he's seen success with CMDBs and change management. This tends to match with what I hear and see: help desks and CMDBs are what's out there for the most part. We talk about the long schedule that IT Management standards and practices tend to go on. Unlike web standards where the standards lag behind the in-use reality, IT Management standards tend to be way ahead of their actual implementation. Spiceworks 2.0Moving away from the "E" in "ESM," I talk about the recent release of Spiceworks 2.0. Of note is their user base number of 200,000 and the "product pages" they've included. Product pages center around devices, software, and other "IT Assets." Spiceworks attaches reviews, user comments, and trouble-shooting to these product pages, building up a tasty looking database of IT data. Rumors!John points out a recently Motley Fool piece on Microsoft buying Yahoo! (re-viving that old story), which makes me recall a recent post from Ryan Shopp outlining a scenario of Cisco buying BMC. As I point out, the "who'll buy BMC" parlor game is a favorite one among IT Management folks. PredictionsWe round out the show with predictions for 2008: John's Dance PartnersJohn has been thinking about combinations of people in 2008, like:
As John says, all it takes is one nutty combination like above to kick-start a whole chain of them. Kind of like we saw a BI acquisition spree last year. Who knows if this whole "Cloud" thing will pay off or if it'll just be blue skies in '08. He ends saying "Google...everybody," which raises my favorite, perennial topic of "when is Google going to really go nuts for Enterprise stuff." Put another way, John asks, "who's gonna own the cloud for the enterprise." Who's JP Morgan Chase going to go to? John says IBM is the best well positioned at the moment, but we both agree that you (someone like Google or Amazon) can acquire Enterprise feel goods. The Little 4I lay out a prediction that some of The Little 4 will either slow down or get acquired by an existing vendor. While I'm not saying that they're in a bad spot, several of them have been around long enough that they're entering the debutant time of their lives. More, big tech companies like to innovate by acquiring, and the open source IT Management companies have to look pretty attractive for innovation, but more importantly for a leaner, quicker (see Zenoss' recent switch to 30 days cycles) way to deliver monitoring and management. We spend quite a bit more time talking about acquisition dynamics in the space and John's feel that some folks at large folks still don't "get" paying for "free" software. Disclaimer: IBM, BMC, Spiceworks, Zenoss, GroundWork, FiveRuns, and SAP are client. Comments[0] |



































